house, he
would have definitely spoken to that effect. As
rightly pointed out by the trial Court and the First
Appellate Court, if deceased Venkavva ... sought to be projected by
defendants, certainly these witnesses would not
have forgotten to mention about these material
aspects in their evidence, more particularly, when
unheard of and
does not appeal to reason, the Plaintiff has forgotten whilst making such a
submission, that even in the year 2004, when Chamber ... whilst making such baseless and untenable
allegations against the Defendants has conveniently forgotten the fact that it had all
the opportunity to make an application
noted that Mos.4 and 5 are the sealed bottles containing
right and left hand washes of AO respectively. PW7 admitted in his cross-
examination ... further demand cannot be shunned. It should not be forgotten that
chemical test in a trap case is only a corroborative piece of evidence
acquired any vested rights. The fact that the Government was the seller does not change the legal position once its exclusive right to deal with ... irrelevant. Citizens cannot have any fundamental right to trade or carry on business in the properties or right belonging to the Government- nor can there
acquired any vested rights. The fact that the Government was the seller does not change the legal position once its exclusive right to deal with ... irrelevant. Citizens cannot have any fundamental right to trade or carry on business in the properties or right belonging to the Government- nor can there
jurisdiction. As a constitutional court it has
a duty to protect the rights of the citizens but
simultaneously it is to keep itself alive ... inaction on the part of a litigant - a litigant who has
forgotten the basic norms, namely, "procrastination
is the greatest thief of time
compassionate appointment it is not the
surest way to a legally enforceable right or a legitimate expectation of a job
in a government office ... plight of street children, the poor, the
homeless, the lost and the forgotten who have had no advantage of descent
and the biological euphoria
jurisdiction. As a constitutional court it has a
duty to protect the rights of the citizens but simultaneously it is to keep
itself alive ... inaction on the
part of a litigant - a litigant who has forgotten the basic norms, namely,
"procrastination is the greatest thief of time
income, is presently taking refuge under her
Uncle. Petitioner appears to have forgotten his moral
and legal obligation to maintain his wife, more ... annual income
could be reckoned as `3 lakhs nevertheless stumbled
upon the right decision.
13. The faint effort by learned Counsel for the
petitioner
1041/2014 ORDER
constitutional court it has a duty to
protect the rights of the citizens but
simultaneously it is to keep itself
alive ... inaction
on the part of a litigant - a litigant
who has forgotten the basic norms,
namely, "procrastination is the greatest
thief of time
