Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Baljeet Singh & Anr. vs State on 26 September, 2014 Author: Kailash Gambhir Bench: Kailash

jurisdiction. As a constitutional court it has a duty to protect the rights of the citizens but simultaneously it is to keep itself alive ... inaction on the part of a litigant- a litigant who has forgotten the basic norms, namely, "procrastination is the greatest thief of time

been adopted by the appellant. Submission being that this defence has emanated right from the inception i.e. from the cross-examination of the witnesses ... this defence has thereafter not emerged. It has been forgotten and obviously for the reason that it was not a genuine defence

Pawan Kumar Gupta, the learned Counsel for the State, has rightly submitted that the contradictions which may be present in the evidence led before ... Court are not vital and it was natural that the witnesses had forgotten some minor details after the lapse of time. The learned Counsel pointed

nuts and bolts, he would submit that the investigating official having completely forgotten the recovery of Panna with blood stains at the scene of crime ... entire evidence on record would submit that the trial Court has rightly convicted the accused SUMIT GULATI 2014.12.22 12:13 I attest to the accuracy

State vs Surender @ Sonu Punjabi & Ors. on 17 September, 2014 Author: Mukta Gupta Bench

Pargan Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 5 September, 2014 Equivalent citations: AIR

Sukhlal vs State Of U.P. on 29 May, 2014 Bench: Amar Saran , Sunita Agarwal

The State vs 1. Jitender S/O Hari Chand on 26 November, 2014 FIR No

State vs . Krishnamurthy @ Vicky on 28 July, 2014 IN THE COURT OF Dr. KAMINI LAU