Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

State Of Punjab vs Joginder Singh on 16 November, 1962 Equivalent citations: 1963 AIR 913

liable to pay under section 18A, and while providing for a right of appeal against orders of penalty the Legislature has not provided ... mere mode of computation, because it must not be forgotten that the assessee has a right of appeal against his regular assessment

liable to pay under Section 18A, and while providing for a right of appeal against orders of penalty the Legislature has not provided ... mere mode of computation, because it must not be forgotten that the assessee has a right of appeal against his regular assessment

encroaching not upon the rights of the tenant which are vested in the Custodian, but upon the rights of the landlord. Under the Transfer ... right, it is difficult to understand how the Custodian can claim to interfere with the contractual rights of the landlord. It must not be forgotten

Nagendra Nath Bora & Another vs The Commissioner Of Hills Divisionand ... on 7 February, 1958

corroborated in material particulars by other independent evidence. It would not be right to espect that such independent corroboration should cover the whole ... reasonably and safely accepted as true. But it must never be forgotten that before the Court reaches the stage of considering the question of corroboration

corroborated in material particulars by other independent evidence. It would not be right to expect that such independent corroboration should cover the whole ... reasonably and safely accepted as true. But it must never be forgotten that before the court reaches the stage of considering the question of corroboration

further provides that after delivery of sugar, the owner retains no right except to receive payment therefor under s. 9. This section is criticised ... been found above, valid and constitutional. It must not be forgotten that during-the time payment was due, the owners were getting an additional

which was dismissal. It also held that the Industrial Tribunal was not right in relying upon the recommendations of the Go-Slow Committee ... fide. In coming to this conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal seems to have forgotten that it had already dismissed the appeal of the workmen from

that polygamy is a recognized institution according to Hindu religious practice, the right of the State to legislate on questions relating to marriage cannot ... notwithstanding the fact that it may interfere with the right of a citizen freely to profess, practise and propagate religion. A Question has been raised