that his right to work in a safe environment, an un-
enumerated but integral component of the fundamental right to life and
liberty under Article ... violation of the petitioner‟s right to work in a safe environment. The
fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution
indefeasible right under
Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be told that for the
established violation of the fundamental right to life, he cannot ... violence, including rape and held that this right is
consistent with the right to life under Article 21 , of all who are protected
called this right "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilised men".
28. In India, one of the earliest ... right to privacy as a
fundamental right, but the said right is an essential ingredient of personal liberty.
Every democratic country sanctifies domestic life
argued that the DRC Act violates Fundamental Rights and
Human Rights of the landlords such as the right to equality. In this context ... well.
29. As far as the right to equality under Article 14 and the right to
protection of life under Article 21 are concerned
both.
9. Health care and right to wellness are an intrinsic and important
component of the right to life. The Directive Principle of State Policy ... Supreme Court
declared that the right to health was an integral factor of a meaningful right
to life. The court held that the right
Indu Munshi And Ors. vs Uoi And Ors. on 23 May, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
adverse impact on the petitioner?s livelihood and right to life, which include the right to travel abroad.
Page 1484
7. The respondents aver that ... reasonable restrictions upon the exercise of the freedom of movement, and right to life, both contained in Part III of the Constitution of India, were
guise of rehabilitation of hawkers/street vendors the petitioners' right to life under Article ... Constitution cannot be impaired. The right to squat on public streets is not a part of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution
could well be imagined. The respondents
have in effect snapped her right to life, again guaranteed
by Article 21 of the Constitution.
22. Fundamental rights ... least such
unpalatable happening brought to our notice. The right
to life, and all fundamental rights requires to be
zealously guarded and such rights
Sharda and Jena (Supra) observed, there is no
violation of the right to life, or privacy, or such third party, in directing a DNA test ... undergo such a test
is not an invasion of his right to life. Bhabani Prasad Jena (supra), after noticing all the previous
judgments, including Goutam
