Lastly we have to consider the most
important fundamental right, i.e., right to life guaranteed under Art. 21
RP 670/2010 ... fundamental rights claimed by review petitioners and
their beneficiaries should yield to this more important right, i.e., right
to life under
with the said
proposition that the right to health is an integral facet of the
meaningful right to life and any denial of the same ... lead healthy life and not a life of mere animal
existence. Grant of medical facilities therefore is a
fundamental human right to protect
fundamental right
to him and has also given him the fundamental right of moving
the court for enforcement of his fundamental right, the court
cannot ... fundamental right to
liberty which the State Government has so grossly violated.
Article 21 which guarantees the right to life and liberty will
be denuded
right to receive the amount due to him within reasonable period of time and also on the right to life, guaranteed under ... closely linked to his right of self-respect, and human dignity, which is included in right to life guaranteed by Art.21 of the Constitution
life, or
c)attempts to force her to lead an immoral
life, or
d)disposes of her property or prevents her
exercising her legal rights ... religious
faith. That would be negation of the right to equality and right
to life guaranteed by the Constitution. We discard the theory
that
cases and
recognised the same as an integral part of the right to life itself. In
Hussainara Khatoon and Ors. v. Home Secretary, State ... question the legitimacy of the right to speedy trial as a part of the
right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. The essence
R.Sakthivel vs The Director General Of Police on 13 August, 2010
Author: S.Manikumar
millions of peoples. To live in
healthy environment is also right to life and is thus guaranteed and protected by
Article 21 of the Constitution ... give extended meaning of
"right to life" i.e. safeguarding health of the people, is the right provided and
protected by Article
Sharda and Jena (Supra) observed, there is no
violation of the right to life, or privacy, or such third party, in directing a DNA test ... undergo such a test
is not an invasion of his right to life. Bhabani Prasad Jena (supra), after noticing all the previous
judgments, including Goutam
justified in invoking the writ jurisdiction as their right to livelihood and their right to life guaranteed by Article 19 and Article ... right to livelihood, and Article 21 of the Constitution of India dealing with the right to livelihood as part of right to life state that
