case,
particularly, when the Apex Court has made
applicable the right to privacy in its
conclusion in Selvi and others (supra) and has
held that ... criminal to justice. Withholding such
information cannot be traced to the right to
privacy, which itself is not an absolute
right. In this regard, reference
Swapnil Tripathi vs Supreme Court Of India on 26 September, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR 2018
such scientific
advances and tools which result in invasion of right to privacy of
an individual and may not only be prejudicial to the rights ... such scientific advances
and tools which result in invasion of right to
privacy of an individual and may not only be
prejudicial to the rights
Mangal Giri vs State Of U.P. on 31 August, 2018
Bench: Sunita Agarwal , Vivek
such
scientific advances and tools which result in invasion of right to privacy of an
individual and may not only be prejudicial to the rights ... conception. In our view, when there is
apparent conflict between the right to privacy of a person not to submit
himself forcibly to medical examination
right of the people to be secure in their persons, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated. Thus the privacy ... subject such regulation to constitutional limitations by recognition of a fundamental right to privacy,. analogous to the American Fourth Amendment, we have no justification
view, when there is apparent conflict between the right to
privacy of a person not to submit himself forcibly to medical examination and
duty
Though the complainant has got right
to demand the copies of the relevant records but he has no
vested right to get the same ... Court has to consider various
17
factors including the right of privacy of an individual who is likely
to be affected, the purpose and object
that the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu also had her right to privacy regarding the treatment given to her. The petitioner has not made ... appointed by the Government of Tamil Nadu, the petitioner has no legal rights questioning about the suspicious death of the former Chief Minister of Tamil
that the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu also had her right to privacy regarding the treatment given to her. The petitioner has not make ... appointed by the Government of Tamil Nadu, the petitioner have no legal rights questioning about the suspicious death of the former Chief Minister of Tamil
