having been provided is a
violation of his right against self-incrimination
and right to privacy which are guaranteed
under Articles 20 clause ... provide for taking away the fundamental
rights guaranteed under Article 20 (3) and
21 , particularly the Right to privacy, is
protected under Article
impugned order
contended that the learned trial Court has rightly protected the
privacy of the victim and refused to supply the copy of electronic
record ... intraconflict of
fundamental rights flowing from Article 21 , that is right to a fair
trial of the accused and right to privacy of the victim
person to give
a sample of his voice violate the fundamental right to
privacy under Article 20(3) of the Constitution, is the
next question ... Puttaswamy (Privacy-
13
9J.) v. Union of India [K.S. Puttaswamy (Privacy-
9J.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1] the
fundamental right
impugned order
contended that the learned trial Court has rightly protected the
privacy of the victim and refused to supply the copy of electronic
record ... intraconflict of
fundamental rights flowing from Article 21 , that is right to a fair
trial of the accused and right to privacy of the victim
opening of
history sheets, continuation of the same and also right to privacy in
Kharak Singh v. The State ... time and held that
the same would not only violate the right of privacy but also other
fundamental rights of such persons under Articles
opening of
history sheets, continuation of the same and also right to privacy in
Kharak Singh v. The State ... time and held that
the same would not only violate the right of privacy but also other
fundamental rights of such persons under Articles
opening of
history sheets, continuation of the same and also right to privacy in
Kharak Singh v. The State ... time and held that
the same would not only violate the right of privacy but also other
fundamental rights of such persons under Articles
plaintiff has
infringed the right to life, the fundamental right of her have better
environment, natural light, air and privacy. She without any
13
Judgment ... plaintiff has infringed her right to life and violated the
fundamental rights to have better environment, natural light,
air and privacy. That she has without
fundamental principles guaranteed under the Constitution – open court
proceedings; and the fundamental right to the freedom of speech and expression.
C.1 Open Courts ... certain exceptional
circumstances to preserve countervailing interests such as the rights to privacy
and fair trial, for instance, in a sexual assault case, public scrutiny
also social stigma to the victim and violation of her
right to privacy. It is a blatant violation of woman
bodily integrity
