Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

State vs . (1) Prem Chand Jain on 20 September, 2014 IN THE COURT OF Dr

PW10 SI Daljeet Singh has deposed that he has brought the duty roaster for the month of May 2008 for dated 17.05.2008 copy of which ... deposed that as per duty roaster HC Dharamvir was on patrolling duty in beat no.9 and HC Yogesh and Ct. Rameshwar were on motorcycle

that MTNL Delhi Unit had provided the above mentioned works/ projects on Roaster Basis to give proposal/solutions and the same was intimated ... MTNL in Delhi Jal Board Project in May, 2007. Therefore, as per Roaster System for distribution of work among CBI Vs R.S.P. Sinha

posted as Munshi at Traffic Circle Seelampur. He handed over Duty Roaster of traffic staff namely ASI Hari Kishan, Ct. Ravinder and Ct. Ram Kishore ... Kishan (PW­11) is a witness to seizure of Duty Roaster produced by Ct. Sheikh Sattar. 3.6. Umesh Kumar (PW­12) was Additional

view the defence taken by the accused that there was a Duty Roaster in his hospital wherein the name and numbers of the Doctors ... date of incident and today he has not brought the Duty Roaster pertaining to the date of incident. This shows that DW1 Chandra Kiran

dated 26.11.2008 which is Ex. PW10/A. The duty roaster of Police Station Staff DBG Road Sub Division Pahar Ganj, Central District dated ... record which is Ex. PW3/A. He also collected the Duty Roaster of Police Station Staff dated 26.11.2008 and placed the same on record

this reason her name is not mentioned in the duty roaster dated 16.11.2013. He deposed that name of W/Ct. Sumita has been mentioned ... daily chittha and the duty roaster is separate from daily chittha. He further deposed that accused driver did not refuse

public persons. He admitted that he had not collected the duty roaster/departure entry of the said traffic Constable but denied the suggestion that said ... Subzi Mandi State Vs. Dharmender Singh page 6/8 duty roaster or departure entry has been brought on record to show the presence

application was moved when the 2 nd Judge was allotted the roaster to deal with the application under Section 438 CrPC. 8. To appreciate

witness not as per his sweet will but as per the Official Roaster as prepared by the Anti Corruption Branch in usual course of official