suspect involved in robbery and snatching cases
including a robbery case bearing FIR No.174/2020 dated 20-
07-2020, u/s 392/34PS ... Mohd. Azharuddin
@ Ajan @ Azhar in auto-lifting (motor cycle), snatching and
robbery cases of the area, the Petitioner no. 1 was brought to
Police Station
Jyoti Gupta and Aditya Gupta identified four persons who
participated in the robbery, out of whom two i.e. Pankaj and Jitender
pleaded guilty ... Crime Branch, Chanakyapuri in order to know the status of the
robbery case, where he found the appellant in the police station. He
identified
succeed in snatching the brief case. Thus, this is a case of attempt of robbery.
Hence, the appropriate section under which the Appellant ... with weapon while committing robbery/dacoity or attempting to
commit robbery/dacoity. Section 397 IPC applies when offence of
dacoity/robbery has finally been committed
hereunder:
"390. Robbery. - In all robbery there is either theft or extortion.
When theft is robbery. -- Theft is "robbery" if, in order ... robbery, the
appellants were armed with deadly weapons and they used
the same while committing the robbery, so as to cover the
case within
shows that no robbery
was committed and it was case of attempt to robbery only. Section 394
provides that if any person in committing ... punished
shall not be less than 7 years. In the present case robbery has not been
committed, only an attempt to robbery was made which
Singh the star witness of the prosecution case in his first statement has
leveled no allegation of robbery. The only allegation leveled is that ... Mubarakpur.
9. Further the contention of the learned Appellant that no case for
robbery is made out as in the first statement the Complainant
know
anything about the present case and that whether any incident of robbery had
taken place at the shop of Vijay Kumar in the year ... along with his accomplice
persons had committed robbery. On 25th May, 1992 Mohd. Saleem was
arrested in case FIR No. 206/1992 under Section
that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
16. Further after the prosecution has proved its case, the onus shifted on
Ganesh under ... accused. In the facts of
this case, it appears to us that murder and robbery have
been proved to have been integral parts
bring the charges under Section 397 IPC are (i) commission of robbery or
dacoity (ii) that the accused used the deadly weapon; or caused grievous ... above act was done
during commission of robbery or dacoity. In the present case, the witnesses
have stated that Appellants when entered the shop
which is
around 2 years in the case of Appellant Dharambir and 1 years in the case of
Appellant Shashi.
5. Learned ... alleged robbery of the articles. The PW1 and PW2 were assaulted
together. In the absence of corroboration of the testimony of PW2 of robbery
from
