said case is still pending trial before Judicial Magistrate No. II, Hosur. As regards the second adverse case occurrence dated 28.2.1994, case was registered against ... case relates to Hosur P.S. Cr. No. 250/95 for offences under Sections 392 and 398 IPC. It was a case of robbery
said case is still
pending trial before Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur. As regards the second
adverse case occurrence dated 28.2.1994 , case was registered against ... case
relates to Hosur P.S. Cr. No.250/95 for offences under Sections 392 and 398
IPC. It was a case of robbery
five adverse cases and the
ground case under which the detenu was detained, submitted that inasmuch as
the ground case incident is the solitary instance ... which, 2 cases were under
Section 392 IPC. and 6 cases under Section 379 IPC. Insofar as the ground
case therein is concerned
adverse cases related
to offence of theft under Section-379 IPC. and the ground case related only
to a solitary instance, wherein a case ... stated that out of eight adverse
cases, the first case would relate to robbery, where it is stated that on
22-6-2001, the detenu
theft committed, then as a natural
corollary there cannot be robbery. Robbery is only an
aggravated form of offence of theft or extortion. Aggravation ... have, therefore,
made robbery a separate crime.
There can be no case of robbery which
does not fall within the definition either of theft
Nagar besides other places and that out of 1 2 adverse cases, seven
cases related to K.K. Nagar and M.G.R. Nagar, which ... parking their two wheelers in the area. Considering
the ground case of robbery, the Division Bench upheld the order of the
detaining authority
conviction of the
accused persons in the concerned case who were being tried for murder and
robbery. The High Court with reference to evidence
Gulab Chand v. State of M.P. , reported in 1995 Supreme Court Cases
(Cri) 552, the following conclusion in para 4 is relevant ... accused. In the facts of this case, it appears to us that murder
and robbery have been proved to have been integral parts
case of any of the witnesses, that the second accused also removed jewels or it is not the case of the prosecution that some ... recovered. It is not the case of the prosecution directly, that this accused had actually participated in the robbery and no charge is also framed
inasmuch as all the eight adverse cases relating to the offence
under Section 379 IPC and the ground case alone relates to the offences under ... above said Supreme Court case, Their Lordships, after pointing out that the
solitary instance of robbery, as mentioned in the grounds of detention
