Roofit Industries Ltd. vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India on 9 August, 2004
ORDER
Kumar Rajaratnam, J. (Presiding Officer)
1. The appeal is taken ... required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd., which is the appellant before us.
5. There
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
required, according to the respondent, to investigate transactions in the shares of Roofit Industries Ltd.
5. There can be no dispute that the appellant ... that it was involved in any kind of rigging with regard to Roofit Industries Ltd. It is further submitted by the learned counsel
