M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October, 2006
petitioners. Petitioners say
that if accelerated seniority is given to the roster-point
promotees, the consequences would be disastrous. A
roster-point promotee
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14480 (5.24 seconds)Ajit Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 16 September, 1999
large number of places. In a roster
with 100 places, if the roster points are 8, 16, 24 etc. at
each of these points ... Sabharwal vs. State of
Punjab . (iii) Seniority of roster promotees: Question is
whether roster point promotions from Level 1 to Level 2 to
reserved candidates
Union Of India And Ors. Etc vs Virpal Singh Chauhan Etc on 10 October, 1995
have been reserved and earmarked in
the roster for the Scheduled Castes.
Roster points 26 and 76 are reserved for
the members of Backward Classes ... which the post belonged in the roster.
For example, the Scheduled Caste persons
holding the posts at roster points 1, 7,
15, retire then roese
Ajit Singh Januja & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 March, 1996
have
been reserved and earmarked in the
roster for the Scheduled Castes.
Roster points 26 and 76 are
reserved for the members of
Backward Classes ... cadre are filled. In a 100-point
roster, 14 posts at various roster
point are filled from amongst the
Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe
candidates
Bimlesh Tanwar vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 10 March, 2003
reserved post, if a roster is set at Level 1 for
promotion of the reserved candidate at various
roster points to Level 2, the reserved ... large number of places. In a
roster with 100 places, if the roster points are 8,
16, 24 etc. at each of these points
Post Graduate Institute Of ... vs Faculty Association And ... on 17 April, 1998
been decided that the
existing 200 point, 40 point and 120 point vacancy-based
rosters shall be replaced by post based rosters. All the
Ministries ... Rosters annexed to this O.M. as Annexure-II, III and IV.
Similarly, the concerned authorities may prepare rosters to
replace the existing 100 point
B.K.Pavitra & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 February, 2017
said judgments. Pointing out the consequence of
accelerated seniority to the roster point promotee, it has been averred in
the writ petition that the roster ... category and
general category candidates promoted together was not disturbed. The
roster points ensured that there was no excessive representation in
different cadres of service
Post Graduate Institute Of ... vs Faculty Association And Ors.M.L. ... on 17 April, 1998
been decided that the
existing 200 point, 40 point and 120 point vacancy-based
rosters shall be replaced by post based rosters. All the
Ministries ... Rosters annexed to this O.M. as Annexure-II, III and IV.
Similarly, the concerned authorities may prepare rosters to
replace the existing 100 point
Dr. Chakradhar Paswan vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 8 March, 1988
systems. The
State Government had in the meanwhile prescribed a 50 point
roster to implement the policy of reservation to posts and
appointments for members ... moot point whether the isolated posts like
those of the Deputy Directors can be subjected to the 50
point roster by the rotational system
Post Graduate Institute Ofmedical ... vs K.L.Narasimhan & Anr. Etc on 2 May, 1997
points are filled
up, the roaster gets exhausted but, in the latter paragraph,
it was pointed out that re-cycling would start after the
roster ... recycling of the roster
starts running like current account and as and when vacancy
arises in accordance with the roster point, the
posts/vacancies would