been promoted
against Roster Point No. 471 whereas the said roster point was reserved for
the handicapped category. It has also been prayed that ... that as per working roster register of Chief
Engineer, the running roster point was filled up upto 425 and roster point
No.411 had already
block; point No.34 to point No.67, 2nd block;
and point No.68 to point No.100, 3rd block. Roster point ... point roster envisaged for physically
challenged. It was asserted that points No.1, 34 and 67 are the
reserved points in a 100 point roster
provides reservation for handicapped person at
roster points 17, 50 and 84 and none of these roster points was
under consideration for appointment ... would be shifted between
roster point 02 to 33, roster point 34 to 66 and between roster point
67 to 100, and, would be filled
made as per the roster clearance and as per
the guidelines, roster point 7101 is fixed for female handicapped
is not completely de horse ... adjusted against the
SC point in the reservation roster and the general
candidate against unreserved point in the relevant
reservation roster. In case none
Roster Point Nos.
34, 68 and 100, instead of Roster Point Nos. 1, 34
and 67 for the persons with disabilities in the 100
Point ... Roster Point
Nos. 1, 34 and 67 for the persons with disabilities
in the 100 Point Roster, and direct the respondents
to operate Point
point between points 67 to 100. In the present case, the state had
contended that the roster point in respect of orthopedically handicapped falls ... necessary to reach the 100th roster point. Since the roster point in respect of
orthopedically handicapped person falls within points 67 to 100, the appointment
point roster for physically
disabled on point nos. 1,34 and 67 in the 100 point roster and
further declared that the original petitioner ... with disabilities in the 100 point roster
instead of providing points 1, 34 and 67 in the 100 point roster,
is absolutely unreasonable and arbitrary
merit list of said visually handicapped category and since
the post that is reserved for visually handicapped (women) (roster
point.6) could not be filled ... post reserved for category (a)
disability i.e., visually handicapped (woman) (roster point No.6) under
DSC-2019.
14. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed
Divisional
Engineer with all consequent benefits by considering the Orthopedically
Handicapped roster points for PHC which was carry forwarded from the
year ... organisation to restore him as
Divisional Engineer by considering the Orthopedically Handicapped
roster points of PHC which was carry forwarded from the year
that roster point No.106 is earmarked for visually
handicapped persons and the said roster point could not be filled due
to lack of eligible ... post of Superintendent in roster
No.106, which is earmarked for visually handicapped persons, by
interchanging the said roster point to other handicapped persons like
