reserving the point Nos. 1, 34 and
67 for Physically Handicapped candidates in the 100
point roster rigister;
(c) PENDING THE HEARING ... Point Roster, and direct the respondents
to operate Point Nos. 1, 34 and 67 for persons with
disabilities while implementing the 100 Point Roster
block; point No.34 to point No.67, 2nd block;
and point No.68 to point No.100, 3rd block. Roster point ... roster envisaged for physically
challenged. It was asserted that points No.1, 34 and 67 are the
reserved points in a 100 point roster
rules of rotation
on a roster of 100 points, the turns alloted for physically
handicapped candidates are at points ... blind in a 100 point roster, would be adjusted between
the deaf and physically handicapped. The present selection
having set apart the first
reserving the point Nos. 1, 34 and
67 for Physically Handicapped candidates in the 100
point roster register;
(c) PENDING THE HEARING ... point roster for physically
disabled on point nos. 1,34 and 67 in the 100 point roster and
further declared that the original
been promoted
against Roster Point No. 471 whereas the said roster point was reserved for
the handicapped category. It has also been ... working roster register of Chief
Engineer, the running roster point was filled up upto 425 and roster point
No.411 had already
roster
point. Thereafter, they were also promoted as Matron on 21.01.2016 against
the roster points reserved for the physically handicapped category ... year 2011 and 2013 against the roster points
reserved for physically handicapped category and, therefore, withdraw the
said relief.
His arguments qua reversion
Department notification No. 458 dated 30.09.2002 at
roster point 32 on the basis of being physically handicapped and
being an EBC candidate under ... would be shifted between
roster point 02 to 33, roster point 34 to 66 and between roster point
petitioner claimed that three points are reserved for physically
handicapped persons in a 100 point roster. When their turn arise ... next
rotation of 100 point roster, the petitioner was promoted at 24th point and
another physically handicapped person was promoted at 34th point
promotion to the post of Superintendent on the roster point reserved for
physically handicapped from the date, the said roster point came ... petitioner for
promotion to the Superintendent against the said roster point for the
physically handicapped employee.
Faced with the situation, petitioner submits that
regard to reservation on roster
point wherein different roster point has been fixed for different
categories of handicapped.
5. It is submitted ... that with reference to the roster point fixed
for physically handicapped persons in the category of the petitioner
the petitioner does not become
