asabove, which is just nothing more than a proposal to
make roving enquiries. It is like a proposal where any and
all assessment orders will ... erroneous. It is a
settled law that just to make roving enquiries to satisfy the
whims of the revisionary authority in an already competed
assessment
that at the stage of discharge the court
cannot make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons
of the matter and weigh the evidence ... This however does not mean that the
Judge should make a roving enquiry into the pros and
19
cons of the matter and weigh
cannot initiate proceedings with a view to start fishing and roving. enquiries in matters or orders which are already concluded.'
Reference is also invited ... merely tried to make fishing and roving enquiries against the settled issues and such an act on the part of him is against the principles
that at the stage of discharge the court cannot make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence ... This however does not mean that the Judge should make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the materials
This however does not mean that the judge should make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence ... This however does not mean that the Judge should make a roving enquiry into the pros and cons of the matter and weigh the evidence
while conducting enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act, a roving enquiry is not contemplated, by relying upon the judgement of the Supreme Court ... does not make it obligatory on the authority to conduct a roving enquiry to find out the actual owners, beyond the names reflected
that notice Under Section 148 could not be issued in making roving enquiries on the basis of vague suspicion. He thus annulled the assessment order ... escaped assessment. Notice Under Section 148 cannot be issued for making roving enquiries on the basis of vague suspicions. Accordingly, in view of the above
contempt petition, the Court was not expected to conduct a roving enquiry and go beyond the very judgment which has allegedly been violated. Relevant para ... Bora (Supra), the Apex Court had clearly held that no roving enquiry can be conducted by a Contempt Court.
35. Similarly, in Three Cheers Entertainment
respondents, now erroneously claim that they are not bound to make roving enquiry in respect of title and then to issue notice to the persons ... that it is not required for the authorities to make a roving enquiry to find out the real owners of the properties. He would submit
that notice under Section 148 could not be issued in making roving enquiries on the basis of vague suspicion. He thus annulled the assessment order ... escaped assessment. Notice under Section 148 cannot be issued for making roving enquiries on the basis of vague suspicions. Accordingly, in view of the above
