Hirachand Gangji vs Rowji Sojpal on 1 August, 1938
Equivalent citations: (1939)41BOMLR760, AIR 1939 BOMBAY 377
JUDGMENT
Rangnekar, J.
1. This case raises ... that business were one Tejoo Kaya and Dharsi Lila. Sojpal had four sons,Gangji, Rowji, Pallon and Meghji. Of these, Gangji died
Demibai Gengji Sojpal vs Rowji Sojpal on 9 July, 1936
Equivalent citations: (1937)39BOMLR471
JUDGMENT
B.J. Wadia, J.
1. This is a rule nisi
suit came to be filed under the following circumstances.
2. One Rowji Sojpal entered into a contract with defendant No. 1, the Municipal Corporation ... Muncipality to Rowji Sojpal on March 31, 1950. On March 20, 1950, Rowji Sojpal on March 31, 1950. On March 20, 1950, Rowji Sojpal assigned
Rowji Sojpal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay on 6 February, 1957
Equivalent citations: AIR1957BOM294, (1957)59BOMLR445, ILR1957BOM447, AIR 1957 BOMBAY
Demibai Gengji Sojpal vs Rowji Sojpal And Ors. And In Re: Cooverji ... on 9 July, 1936
Equivalent citations: AIR1937BOM305, AIR 1937 BOMBAY 305
ORDER
suit came to be filed under the following circumstances.
2. One Rowji Sojpal entered into a contract with defendant 1, the Municipal Corporation of Bombay ... Municipality to Rowji Sojpal on 31-3-1950. On 20-3-1950, Rowji Sojpal assigned the benefit under this contract to the plaintiff
Rowji Sojpal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay ... on 6 February, 1957
Equivalent citations: [1957]31ITR721(BOM)
JUDGMENT
Chagla, C.J.
1. This
partition or by a severance of status. In Hirachand v. Rowji Sojpal (1938) 41 Bom. L.R. 760 Rangnekar J. considered the whole ... coparceners, the property had net left the family. In Hirachand v. Rowji Sojpal Rangnekar J. observed (at p. 768):
If, ...on the extinction
which Hindus consider
essential.
Again in 1939 in Hirachand Gangji v. Rowji Sojpal
reported in AIR 1939 Bombay 377, it was observed that
"Jainism
fictional person, such as a limited liability company."
10. In Rowji Sojpal v. CIT [1957] 31 ITR 721 (Bom), the question related to exemption
