contention, Mr.Sibal has cited Talbott v. General Television Corpn. (1981) RPC 1. Quoting the Law of Trade Secrets by Robert Dean at page ... support of his arguments, he placed reliance on Franchi v. Franchi 1967 RPC 149. Learned counsel then contended that springboard doctrine will come into play
confirmed the Order-in-Original No. I D-IV/DB/5/Demand/RPC/83, dated 19-5-1983 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central ... appellants") on 4500 metric tonnes of Raw Petroleum Coke (RPC) produced and removed by the appellants without payment of duty within the factory premises
Referring to the judgment in AMP Incorporated v. Utilux Proprietary Limited 1972 RPC 103 it was argued that the principles regarding unprotectibility of the functional ... unprotectable in Stenor Ltd. v. Whitesides (Clitheroe) Ltd. (1946) 63 RPC 81. According to him the conclusive proof as to the functionality of an object
Company8, Lord Moulton
7
AIR 1981 Del 95 (DB)
8
(1920) 37 RPC 233
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 30/2022 Page ... evidence, after the war, 500 were sold in 1922;
9
1925 (42) RPC 358
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 30/2022 Page
reiterated following Benchairs Ltd. v. Chair Center Ltd. reported at 1974
RPC 429. In Benchairs Ltd. (supra) it was held ".....the question whether ... Company (of Manchester)
Ltd. And Widd and Owen Ltd. reported at 50 RPC 240 to the effect that
publication in a private library where design
charged with, being the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 409
RPC are not the scheduled offences enumerated in Schedule A of PMLA.
The offence ... criminal conspiracy punishable under Section 120-B RPC
without predicate offence being a scheduled offence is not amenable to the
jurisdiction of Enforcement Directorate. Unless
Lord Diplock it was observed:
"Spalding v. Gamage (1915) 32 RPC 273 (H.L.) and the later cases
make it possible to identify five ... classic explanation of Parker J in Burberrys v. Cording (1909) 26
RPC 693 is as follows:
"It is important for this purpose to consider
settled: Seerecent decision Henry Hemmings,
Ltd. v. George Hemmings, Ltd. [(1951) 68 RPC 47] As a temporary
injunction is merely of a provisional nature ... relief at the
hearing. Colman v. Farrow & Co. [(1898) 15 RPC 198] , Hoover,
Ltd.v. Air-way Ltd. [(1936) 53 RPC 399] , Upper Assam
Tibet Snow case and on The Bali case reported in 16 RPC 387, and the Bullova case reported in 9 RPC 229. So going ... case of Wright. Crossley & Co. reported in 15 RPC 131, the case on which the learned Counsel for the appellant relied very much. Normally
2013 titled State v/s Rajinder
Singh u/s 376 RPC by which appellant has been convicted and
sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment ... with
Police Station, Kanachack, Jammu for commission of offence
under Section 376 RPC. The investigation of the case was
entrusted to Inspector Jatinder Raina. During
