accused No.1 and 2
being aggrieved by the order passed in RRT No.162/2010-2011 in
respect of the property bearing ... accused No.1 and 2
being aggrieved by the order passed in RRT
No.162/2010-2011 in respect of property
bearing
jnim the. context that the test of minor
offence -is "not rrt~;:relg--.that the 'prescribed punishment is
less thtanflfzerg major tgffence
Government
Hospital at Ramanaga_rrt.':i_got'*» her admitted
there.--. She l5elon"Ts"t0 Hariiari caste
accused in Crime
_,VNo.1O,5§i{/i 2010, niqi .._f1,rrt_I}€I' discussion wouid be required in
same consideration
applicant no.2 had made objection application for
which disputed case being RRT-Takrari/KHD/179 of 2023
was registered.
5. It was submitted
they filed a revision case before the Government
vide RRT No. 235 of 1995 and the same was pending. On these facts,
the defendants prayed
Situ Sahu & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. :
2005 (1) RRT 161 (SC); and State of Rajasthan Vs. Teja
7at1 --. I, • :d._)--s.rrt--i I •r "'
t * c_i I
--•• ..
_. ,. (9 -- ;ij
' - .t '•i • •,.
--
." a
6
receipt
pi21i:1ant. at about 3
' ;5.*rrt.;;& on 82.98 who says {hat E:}1¢:ra*£3 were
rødiatur arili. enr b •nret •i 1 411% 1
tai.k 'rrt ddn.aged. ''ter'n,t 'vtlv
