third party.
5. Mr. Tiku, however, submits that the reasoning in W.P.(C) 2232/2012
for release of third party information that the said ... third party
to make a submission in writing or orally, regarding whether the
information should be disclosed, and such submission of the third
party shall
were maintainable under the RTI Act .
THERE IS NO INHERENT INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN SCR AND RTI
ACT. BOTH ENABLE THE THIRD PARTY TO OBTAIN THE
INFORMATION ... RTI Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is any inconsistency
between SCR and RTI Act, regarding providing information to the third
party. Both
information pertaining to
or which „relates to‟ such third party without affording
such third party an opportunity of being heard on whether
such disclosure should ... other
employee as that would constitute third party information. This Court is
also of the opinion that third party information can only be disclosed
provided as it is the third party information and
comes under section 8 (1) (J) of RTI ACT as there is no
LPA 207/2020 ... register with their salary bills and hence, it is not the
third-party information. We are not inclined to accept this contention in
view
PROPOSALS FOR PROMOTION OF
THIRD PARTIES CANNOT BE PROVIDED TO THE RESPONDENT IN
VIEW OF SECTION 11 OF THE RTI ACT.
25. However, this Court ... promotion of third parties cannot be provided to the
respondent in view of Sections 8(1)(j) and 11 of the RTI Act.
26. Consequently
misreading of
Sections 8 (1) (e) and (j) of the RTI Act . The fiduciary
relationship, if at all, is between the employer and the
employee ... case, the Respondent herein. The
exemption is from disclosure to a third party and
certainly not to the Respondent himself. In fact, as
explained
rights of
W.P.(C) 6333/2010 Page 4 of 6
the parties. If the writ petition is filed beyond the period
of limitation prescribed ... merits."
(emphasis supplied)
6. Further in the present case, third party rights had been created in
1990 and consequently, the petitioner by not filing
mechanical manner. He further states that information qua the third party
which is necessary for the interest of public at large cannot be
declined/refused ... also of the view that petitioner's queries pertain to third
parties and disclosure of information in the present case would cause
unwarranted invasion
Dharmendra Kumar Tandon vs State on 12 September, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 DEL 1590
Vinay Tiwari vs State on 24 December, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 DEL 2064, 2020
