Etpfieiisrif' iiotereate any third party right
in the suvit _y«pr0pe'rty;
thmfiheafixnfifisfimimeanamdmmmfiunmxmkmg
to the abbveieffect within two weeks from today
litis. Unless the third
"_:'V""v.;5a.rties,/_app'i'i'cants are necessary parties for deciding ... order compelling the
T .ipI"a*intiff to implead third parties to the suit. Keeping in view
it
9' u
the relief prayed
third party' risk only.
4. In the claim petiti'o}'1. irisura.nce._ c:o_Ii"ipany was
made a party ... that, an
occupant in at privaiteVcarl'is_ln.ot a third party. The insured has
not paid an"y..additi'onal premiuni
third party.
right that is available for defendant in
thisjproceeclirieglis to show whether suit schedule property is
- 'joint 1)rope~rty of herself
third
respondent. heiVng;A:_a._l;l3'u]o1lie«authority. as defined under the
RTI A,.A_(:t furvnisri same. Indeed, he would ... 5ondent..
%
_ authority.
El
12. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for
the parties. t.he two points which would __fall for
determination in this writ
Owners to take up the development
through alternative Developers.
WHEREAS the I Party Ovvners do"*noff~have it
financial resources, profess:i'onal expe ... rties:" herein have
finalised on certain
terms agreed to be
ber1e'fic-§a:l':ii,to Cwners, through the 11
Party express
owVer::'of>attorney.'delegating power in favour
of third 'party andVi"t..'gi5:.<a--i.s"othis ... power a°'ttio._rneyfj'.--in"favou-igr of third parties giving
them right toVV
eAfe.ndant":va_gai';:st the ii'
third plaintiff in that connection on in
newspaper "Daily Salar".
4. Defendants ... herefo.rey"e,ven't:h'oiighu
the third defendant has not prod-ugced other other
than
false to property is
sold to a_third;_party,__"«Jj--.,_wou'.1d get more money
and if the paropeirtgf "Vise .sold ... From ciliear that if the property
was agreed to a third party, property
would fetch a*xI}ore','-- money
petitione1-:"§gr,ithiV.i':;1~"third--party, has erroneously held that the Court
--V wouiid .h'aye"'ji1risdict ... aiiegation
that there is a contract between t3 petitioner and a third party and
that this was in breach of the earlier agreement would