Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Tiruchirapalli, T.N. vs. V.Jayapaul ]
07.2004 SCC (Cri) 1584 [S.Jeevanantham vs. State through Inspector of
Police ... Anti-Corruption, Tiruchirappalli, T.N. vs. V.Jayapaul ] and
2004 SCC (Cri) 1584 [S.Jeevanantham vs. State through Inspector of Police, T.N].
In those
which was in consonance with the provisions of law. In
S.Jeevanantham Vs. State through Inspector of Police, T.N.
(2004) 5 Supreme Court Cases ... adoption of the aforesaid
course, by the Investigating Officer. In S.Jeevanantham's
case (supra) the recovery was effected, from the accused
Gurjant Singh @ Shinda vs State Of Punjab on 2 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT
Dhayan Singh, Inspector,
the Investigating Officer, in this case. In S.Jeevanantham Vs. State through
Inspector of Police, T.N.(2004) 5 Supreme Court Cases ... adoption
of the aforesaid course, by the Investigating Officer. In S.Jeevanantham 's case
(supra), the recovery of contraband was effected from the accused
report to the Court of Special judge."
26. In S.Jeevanantham vs. State through Inspector of Police,
T.N., (2004) 5 Supreme Court Cases
attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
CRA-S-1067-SB-2004 -9-
associated as a witness. The Investigating Officer has already associated ... S.I. Bindu Bala, the Investigating Officer of the case.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case S. Jeevanantham Vs. State through
Inspector
stated here, that in S.Jeevanantham Vs. State through
Inspector of Police, T.N. (2004) 5 Supreme Court Cases, 230,
a case decided ... account of adoption of the aforesaid course, by the
Investigating Officer. S.Jeevanantham 's case (supra) being a
direct authority, the principle
commercial quantity for planting it on the
accused. In V.Jayapaul 's case(supra) the police officer who had registered ... Investigating Officer, which is missing in this case. Further in
S.Jeevanantham Vs. State through Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu
2004(3) Recent Criminal Reports
accused, the lawyer and the Courts in a state of uncertainity and confusion,
which has to be avoided. Therefore, fair investigation, which is very
foundation ... State –vs- Jayapaul reported in [(2004)5 SCC 223];
S.Jeevanantham -vs- State reported in [2004(5) SCC 230]; VinodKumar
-vs- State of Punjab reported
little assistance to the appellant. On the other hand, in S.
Jeevanantham vs. State Through Inspector of Police
