decision in Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. Case would apply to the facts of the case. Though in that case the contract was found ... Pant University case , M. Aslam case ( 2001) 1 SCC 720) and Saraspur Mills case and in all those cases the principal establishment was actually
parent Act.
Learned Senior Counsel contended that the judgment in SAIL
case was in the context of the mineral, Dolomite, and the ratio ... royalty differs from mineral to mineral
and therefore, the decision in SAIL case is not applicable to
the present case where we are concerned with
impugned order.
ii) The respondents 1 to 3 relied on SAIL case, 2010 (10) SCC 744 and Chettinad case (W.P.7233 of 2016) dated ... various issues raised in the present writ petition are covered in SAIL case reported in 2010 (1) SCC 744. Merely issuing a direction for investigation
that contract labour in loading and unloading in SAIL is
abolished still according to SAIL case that does not lead to
automatic absorption of workmen ... absorption of contract labour in SAIL as principal employer, such
relief according to the declaration of law in SAIL case (2 supra) is
unavailable
Consequently, consistent with the
observations of the Supreme Court in the SAIL case,
the exercise by DIAL of the functions and powers of
DIAL ... inescapable conclusion is that
consistent with the observations in the SAIL case,
the statute itself contemplates the Central
Government to be the appropriate government
notwithstanding
hand
and SAIL on the other regarding the supply of the balance 753,461 MT.
SAIL's case was that there was a deliberate ... during the relevant period 2007-08. SAIL's case is that as a result it had
to procure the balance quantity from other sources
National Union Waterfront Workers (2001) 7
SCC 1 (hereafter „the SAIL case‟), the workmen would be entitled to
preference/regular employment in accordance therewith ... Government or the State
Government. Referring to the observations in the SAIL case, it is submitted
that since DIAL is not an entity that carries
substance governmental and non-commercial
functions. The Constitution Bench in SAIL case
(supra) has disagreed with this view in para 41 of
its judgment. Hence ... Mazdoor Union (supra)
has been approved in SAIL (supra) with some divergence.
The authority in SAIL’s case, as the conclusion would
show, covers
SAIL is a Government Company,
the MOU binds SAIL to implement policy decision of the Government of India. It was
also contended that SAIL ... that it was not SAIL that forced IR to buy its requirements
from SAIL but it was IR which forced SAIL to enhance its capability
Court has referred to the decision in SAIL case [SAIL v. National Union Waterfront Workers, (2001) 7 SCC 1] and opined that it is undisputed ... Heavy Engg. Mazdoor Union has been approved in SAIL with some divergence. The authority in SAIL case, as the conclusion would show, covers two situations
