SAIL is a Government Company,
the MOU binds SAIL to implement policy decision of the Government of India. It was
also contended that SAIL ... that it was not SAIL that forced IR to buy its requirements
from SAIL but it was IR which forced SAIL to enhance its capability
reads the order passed by the Apex Court in SAIL case while dismissing the SLP, it is apparent that by no stretch of imagination ... Court in the SLP in SAILs matter. Undoubtedly, in SAILs matter, the decision in Jaypee Rewa case has been followed. Being
credit and that in this case it was also observed that though the Tribunal in the case of SAIL vs CCE, Ranchi reported ... Court in the SLP in SAILs matter. Undoubtedly, in SAILs matter, the decision in Jaypee Rewa case has been followed. Being
Steel Authority of India Limited, Case
No. 11 of 2009 („SAIL case‟) wherein the Commission has upheld the validity
of an open ended exclusive supply ... light of the observations made by the Commission in SAIL case, BCCI has
submitted that the 1st India Territory Agreement provides for an exit
opportunity
these propositions and as held by the Supreme Court in the SAIL case,
appeal would lie only against orders passed under Section ... Though the
Supreme Court in the SAIL case was not required to decide this issue, it gave an
opinion on Section 26 which is reproduced
Tribunal) is not applicable to the present case, as in the case of SAIL v. Collector of Central Excise , supra, the question ... case of M/s. Century Cement v. Collector of Central Excise, Raipur , supra, and after noticing the said two cases, namely, SAIL v. Collector
SAIL
as IR was the only buyer and SAIL was the only supplier. There is a strong
possibility that SAIL wanted the MoU when ... this case discussed above shows that in this case there was
no buyer i.e. IR and one seller i.e. SAIL. Till 2008, there
SAIL is a Governtnettt Cotnpznty. the
MOU binds SAIL to implement policy decision of the Ciovernment of India. it was also
contended that SAIL ... does not restrict IR to take suitable recourse in case
SAIL is not able to meet its requirement, IR still did not procure from JSPL
nowhere referred to or mentioned the Tribunal's Order in SAIL case (supra). In the SAIL case on the one hand, Section ... Majority Opinion had not over-ruled the ratio of the SAIL case. In fact, the final order passed on the basis of Majority Opinion
brought to my notice the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of SAIL vs CCE, Ranchi reported in 2008(222)ELT.233 wherein ... Court dismissing the SLP against the Tribunals judgment in the case of SAIL vs CCE, Ranchi (supra) pleaded that mere summary dismissal
