Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

This was reiterated in Annaimuthu Thevar v. Alagammal . 19. This Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. Edr. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer

This was reiterated in Annaimuthu Thevar v. Alagammal . 19. This Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. Edr. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer

therefore, be binding on the question of title. See in this connection Sajjadanashin Sayed v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer , (2000) 3 SCC 350, where this Court

Annaimuthu Thevar v. Alagammal , ( 2005) 6 SCC 202, Sajjadanashin Sayed Md.B.E. Edr v. Musa Dadhabai Ummer

contended by learned counsel for the appellants. The Apex Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed (supra) referred to the parameters for deciding the question whether the issue ... substantially in issue. 6. Applying the test approved by the court in Sajjadanashin Sayed (supra), it is seen that in the previous judgment, though technically

therefore, be binding on the question of title. See in this connection Sajjadanashin Sayed Vs. Musa Dadabhai Ummer (2000) 3 SCC 350, where this Court

This Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer AIR 2000 SC 1238 (2000) 3 SCC 350 : (2000) 2 MLJ 172, noticed the apparent

equally operates as res judicata." (ii) AIR 2000 SUPREME COURT 1238 (Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B. E. Edr. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer), wherein

Annaimuthu Thevar v. Alagammal [(2005) 6 SCC 202] . 16. This Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. Edr. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer

Annaimuthu Thevar v. Alagammal [(2005) 6 SCC 202] . 16. This Court in Sajjadanashin Sayed Md. B.E. Edr. v. Musa Dadabhai Ummer