Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 75 (1.02 seconds)

Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M/S. Madhan Agro Industries (I) Pvt. ... on 13 April, 2018

been advanced on behalf of the Revenue   that  “Parachute”   is   a   registered   trademark   of Marico and goods are being marketed under the aforesaid trade mark ... unrelated and unconnected to each other. Registration   of   a   trademark   under   any   particular   class cannot be determinative of the classification of the product for   purposes
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 8 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Gloster Ltd vs Gloster Cables Ltd on 22 January, 2026

sale of the trademark “Gloster” by FGIL-Corporate Debtor, a Supplemental Trademark Agreement dated 15.07.2008 for assignment of the trademark “Gloster” bearing ... trademark in question: - “ 6. Trademark viz. Trademark Illegally “Gloster” in the Registration no. assigned to name of the CD valid 690772 in class 9 Gloster
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next