spent huge amount of money on marketing and
developing the wordmark "KRISHVI". The plaintiff has
spent nearly ... similar to the trade name of the plaintiff.
The defendant is using wordmark "Krish-V" with the
similar logo. It is submitted that
examination has admitted that:
"It is correct to suggest that the wordmark
Nandini in Ex.P14 resembles with that appearing
defendant shows that the defendant is
the registered owner of the wordmark TMR under class 5
vide registration dtd. 22.11.2013 user date shown as
proposed
tits case is with respect to said DEVICE
including with respect to WORDMARK- 'NANDHINI'.
So, considering both these documents, I hold that
India, which shows
that the plaintiff has been conferred with the registered
wordmark and trademark 'SG', which is in force even to this
that it
acquired goodwill and reputation. The plaintiff
obtained the registration of wordmark ASHIRVAD and
also logo in black and white as well as colour
