manner, put any embargo on the
Defendant No. 1 for use of wordmark BLUNT for energy drinks or
beverages except in the colour combination Blue ... Defendant No. 1 never agreed to give up its right on the wordmark
viz. 'BLUNT'. However, since prayer clauses along with the images
plaintiff's
trademark, thereby bringing the impugned "BharatPe"
wordmark and " " as close as possible to the
plaintiff's registered ... impugned trademark "BharatPe", whether as a
wordmark or as a trademark, therefore, infringes the
plaintiff's trademark "Phonepe" (in class
uninterruptedly used since 1986 for the
goods viz. biscuits and cookies. The wordmark/ trademark "GOOD
DAY" - bearing Registration No. 452003 in Class ... goods being "biscuits, bread and non-
medicated confectionery" and the wordmark/ trademark bearing
Registration No. 4006020 in Class 30 since 23rd November
Trademark of the plaintiffs viz., wordmark "Uyir" bearing Registration
No.3278983, 3278984, 3278985, 3278986 and 3278987 in English under
Class ... respectively and also the wordmark "c a p h ;"
bearing Registration Nos.3847815, 3847816, 3847817, 3847818 and 3847819
in Tamil under Class
paragraph 21 of the plaint that it had
registration in the wordmark STUDIOMASTER as against a device mark
bearing the same words.
Signature Not Verified
Commission Act, 1956 . It is the prior adopter and owner of the wordmark
KHADI, and device marks and (in short 'the
KHADI trademarks
2021, as "PROPOSED TO BE USED" basis for their
trademark/wordmark "PRAKASH PREMIUM" in Class-17.
4. It is also pointed
defendant shows that the defendant is
the registered owner of the wordmark TMR under class 5
vide registration dtd. 22.11.2013 user date shown as
proposed
information with regard to the
products manufactured by Camex Wellness Limited having wordmark
Companio:
1. Provide reasons for not providing description of Tens
trademarks, the plaintiff company has also registration and
copy right in trademark / wordmark 'GREEN' under class
19 and 20 in respect of plywood ... that
there are various judgments to the effect that even if
trademarks / wordmarks are descriptive in nature, the
injunction can be granted if same
