found vending the article at the time of
taking the sample. The sample consisted of 3 original sealed tin having
identical label declaration and batch ... sample was divided into three equal parts and then put
in one sealed tin as one counterpart of the samples. Each counterpart
containing the sample
plaintiff no.1 has the exclusive right to
reproduce, publish and distribute the said packing materials which are
covered under Section ... newly adopted packaging is
substantially same as already in use. Photographs/samples of the
plaintiffs products under the trade mark CASTROL GTX and CASTROL
trademark WILLS SPORT continuously since its adoption. The
photographs of the samples products of the plaintiff have been
proved ... defendants bearing counterfeit trademark WILLS SPORT.
The plaintiff through Notary Public purchased samples of the
said shirts, jeans and trousers on 23rd October
Super Cassettes Industries Limited vs Mr Chintamani Rao & Ors. on 11 November, 2011
Author
S.N. Sheopuri vs Fab India Overseas P. Ltd. on 4 July, 2011
Author: S
Emergent Genetics India Pvt. Ltd vs Shailendra Shivam And Ors on 2 August, 2011
Author
Ten Xc Wireless Inc & Anr vs Mobi Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) ... on 4 November, 2011
cash and silver coins and
rings from the bed room and distributed the loot amount equally
amongst themselves.
4. Pursuant to the disclosure statement ... lifted from the Polythene guarantee card. The chance
prints were photographed and samples finger prints were also taken,
which were sent by letter dated 23rd
cash and silver coins and
rings from the bed room and distributed the loot amount equally
amongst themselves.
4. Pursuant to the disclosure statement ... lifted from the Polythene guarantee card. The chance
prints were photographed and samples finger prints were also taken,
which were sent by letter dated 23rd
Mohd. Anwar @ Annu vs State on 28 February, 2011
Author: Mukta Gupta
Bench: Mukta Gupta
