Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 357 (0.65 seconds)

Merck Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee on 2 April, 2014

filed any explanation,that it had not given proof of sample distribution to the Doctors, that AO was justified in making the addition, that ... assessee submitted that details of issue of free samples distribution to Doctors has been restored back to the file
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs Pune I on 2 April, 2014

purposes and the physician samples manufactured for other brand owners/ manufacturers of medicines. These physician samples are distributed free-of-cost and therefore, they ... respect of appellants own physician samples distributed free-of-cost and ` 1,46,38,741/- in respect of physician samples sold to other major
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gopal Retail (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs Department Of Income Tax on 12 September, 2014

pertinent to note that the said employee cost, administrative expenses, selling and distribution expenses, depreciation and financial charges are also incurred in the succeeding years ... Damage allowance, Extra discount, Freight, Dealers meeting expenses, sale promotion, sales distribution, sampling, travelling etc. and Financial expenses consists Interest and bank charges. Thus even
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ind Swift Ltd., Chandigarh vs Assessee on 21 August, 2014

assessee in new areas. The expenditure mainly consist of free scheme, sample distribution, new division launch, salary and staff expenses of new divisions ... capital expenditure then same cannot be allowed. Nature of expenses being distribution of samples, opening of new offices etc. clearly show that the assessee
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cce Pune Ii vs U.S. Vitamin Ltd on 7 March, 2014

case where the respondent paid duty on physician samples wrongly. After realizing their mistake that duty is not payable, the respondent has filed a refund ... their appeal holding that there was no unjust enrichment as the samples were distributed of cost to Doctors and as such no excise duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next