only fat contents and milk solids were less to the extent of 4.1% milk fat and
8.0% milk solids not fat. To support this contention ... milk fat and
8.0% milk solids not fat as against the minimum prescribed standard of 4.5%
and 8.5% respectively. This indicates that the milk
effect
that on 28.09.1983 at about 06.30 a.m., he took sample of milk for
examination and on chemical examination from the analyst, the
milk ... dissatisfied by
the report, urged before the trial court that the sample of milk be
sent to Central Food Laboratory. Therefore, when petitioner-
accused himself
despatch of the sample to the Director, Central Food
Laboratory. It is evident from the report Ex.PF also that the sample was
received ... sample within a period of five
days from the receipt of such requisition from the Court.
Where sample of food article like milk which
sample
was collected. The butter sample was sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The report of the public analyst reveals that the butter sample ... contained 16% milk fat whereas it should have been
28.07% milk fat. The butter sold should have 15% fat whereas the
sample show
directed to take the samples from MHC(M) in the present case. Accordingly, he
collected 12 samples which were sealed in a polybag with the seal ... plastic bag. He
opened the milk drums and he found that there was no milk in the drums and in fact
drums were containing quarter
sample bottles of
Vinegar that 'Prepared from Acetic Acid'. As per case of prosecution, label
declaration made on the sample commodity ... milk Glucose biscuits
were taken from the petitioner's premises for the purpose of analysis. The
Public Analyst opined that the sample
State By The Inspector Of Police vs Manoharan on 24 March, 2014
Author: S.Rajeswaran
State vs . (1) Riyazuddin on 6 June, 2014
IN THE COURT OF Dr. KAMINI LAU
Fir No. 1083/02; State vs . Hemant Etc. Page 1 Of 81 on 31 March
about 05:0005:30pm
when he went to fetch milk from mother dairy in front of HBlock, accused
Poly who was residing ... investigation, the IO seized two
sealed parcels from the doctor alongwith sample seal and recorded
statements of the witnesses. On 14.02.2012, on the basis