milk and milk products.
Rule A.11.01 simply defines "milk''. Rule A.11.01.01 prescribes standards for cow milk; every ... part of cow milk and two parts of buffalo milk. The percentage of milk fats in the sample was 1.0 which was far below
such as fatless milk or milk with too low fat content or milk with meagre non-fatty-solid contents such milk would, under the amended ... milk fat was 4.8% and milk solids non-fat was 6.36% against the prescribed standard of 4.5% for milk fat and 8.5% of milk solids
such as fatless milk or milk with too low fat content or milk with meagre non-fatty solid contents such milk would, under the amended ... milk fat was 4.8% and milk solids non fat was 6.36% against the prescribed standard of 4.5% for milk fat and 8.5% of milk solids
find out the fatty and non-fatty contents of the sample milk. In the absence of the examination of the Public Analyst, the report ... milk cannot necessarily be held to be adulterated."
11. In Nagar Swasthya Adhikari v. Ram Swarup, the milk was mixed milk of cow, buffalo
milk on payment of 0.60 P. as price. The milk was divided into three phials after adding formalin. One of the samples was sent ... case of a mixture of the buffalo milk, cow milk and goat milk. The learned Judge was of the opinion that the finding
manner by stirring and churning of the milk. The report of public analyst says that the milk sample was deficient ... milk fact and 39% in milk non solid fat. It is not known as to whether the consistency of milk sample was upto the mark
stirring and churning of the milk. It is recorded that as per the public analyst report the milk sample was deficient in milk ... possible to ascertain correct consistency of milk. The obvious reason is that the properties of milk sample were bound to change with the passage
whether the milk being offered for sale is buffalo milk, cow milk or of any other animal's milk before he embarks upon ... whether the milk being offered for sale is (a) buffalo milk, cow milk or any other class of milk or (b) milk without any indication
formalin added to the sample of food.
In the latter case, the Food Inspector took sample of cow's milk from the respondent weighing ... which the sample was taken on 25th December, 1967.
10. So far as the other case, in which the sample of milk was taken from
respondent was selling adulterated milk. Standards have been prescribed separately for cow's milk and buffalo's milk. It is not disputed ... entire milk were to be taken as that of cow's milk without any buffalo's milk being there, yet the milk
