fats in the milk contents, being, costlier
than the milk itself. If a milk vendor adds water to milk, it will
Criminal Appeal ... page 115, as under:
"General Sampling : The careful and accurate
sampling of milk is of utmost importance in all
analysis of milk. Probably more
respective counsel:-
State of Punjab
Year No. of Samples of No. of samples found
milk and milk adulterated
products
seized/analysed ... State of Haryana
Year No. of Samples of No. of samples found
milk and milk adulterated
products
seized/analysed
time of taken of the
sample, the then Govt. Food Inspector has not mixed
the sample of milk with clock-wise and anti-close
wise ... sample and the
same was not homogeneous, therefore, the alleged
sample taken by the Govt. Food Inspector was a
representative sample and thus no benefit
Kilograms of milk. The milk
was being carried on a motor cycle. 750 Mls. of mixed milk was purchased.
Thereafter sample was taken in consonance ... found that milk was deficient in milk fat by 7% and
milk solid not fat by 48%. Therefore, the sample of the milk
stick or the milk measurement and stirred the milk clock-
wise and anti-clockwise in such a way that the milk at the
bottom ... milk measurement had reached the bottom of
drum and the milk lying at the bottom was thoroughly mixed
with the upper layer of the milk
skimmed milk after making payment of Rs.3/-. It
is stated that the milk was stirred and made homogeneous for analysis.
The purchased sample ... found that the milk fat was 0.1% and the milk solids not fat
was 7.4%, therefore, milk solid not fat was deficient by 15%.
Thereafter
petitioner, purchased 750 mls. of milk,
after stirring the milk and making the contents as homogenous, sample
of mixed milk was taken out from ... part of the sample was
sent to the Public Analyst. The Public Analyst submitted his report
Ex.PD wherein the milk fat was not found
indicated milk.
The milk was being carried in a drum. Food Inspector served a notice
Ex.PA and purchased 750 mls. of milk by paying ... found that the milk fat was 3%
and milk solids not fat was 8.2%. Thus, it was opined as under:-
"Milk
paise vide receipt Ex.PB.
The sample of the milk under the provision of the Act was
sent for examination to Public Analyst, Haryana, Chandigarh ... vide his report Ex.PF opined that the sample was adulterated as milk
fat was 57.5% deficient of the minimum prescribed standards and
was declared
milk for sale,
which was carried in an aluminum vessel. Government Food Inspector
demanded the milk and sample was taken in three dry clean bottles ... Public Analyst's report the sample of the
milk was not in consonance with the prescribed standard and hence the milk
was found
