show that
the voice recorded in the sample i.e. sample voice of Imtiyaz and
the voice recorded on memory card matches, is therefore ... mentioning that the recorded questioned voice and the specimen
voice reveal that the questioned voice is similar to the
specimen voice, is itself incorrect. When
show that
the voice recorded in the sample i.e. sample voice of Imtiyaz and
the voice recorded on memory card matches, is therefore ... mentioning that the recorded questioned voice and the specimen
voice reveal that the questioned voice is similar to the
specimen voice, is itself incorrect. When
show that
the voice recorded in the sample i.e. sample voice of Imtiyaz and
the voice recorded on memory card matches, is therefore ... mentioning that the recorded questioned voice and the specimen
voice reveal that the questioned voice is similar to the
specimen voice, is itself incorrect. When
voice by him.
(28) Inspector- Atul Singh of Lokayukt Organization (PW-5) stated that he
prepared the transcript of conversation recorded in voice recorder transcript ... admitted that he was not acquainted
with the voices recorded in the voice recorder. No sample voice was recorded
and no voice identification test
Judicial Magistrate. He stated that on
November 26, 2001 he recorded the sample audio voices of
accused Asif Reza Khan @ Rajan @ Maharaj @ Ibrahim Sah @
Samar ... Case No. 223 dated July 25, 2001. Before
recording such voice samples, PW57 observed all legal formalities
which he narrated in his deposition. PW57 proved
Judicial Magistrate. He stated that on
November 26, 2001 he recorded the sample audio voices of
accused Asif Reza Khan @ Rajan @ Maharaj @ Ibrahim Sah @
Samar ... Case No. 223 dated July 25, 2001. Before
recording such voice samples, PW57 observed all legal formalities
which he narrated in his deposition. PW57 proved
positive report, stating that the voices in the recorded conversations
were the probable voices of the individuals whose specimen samples
had been sent for comparison ... Jayesh
Bhardwaj during the spectrographic examination of the voice
samples and recorded conversations are relevant and
admissible piece of evidence. These work-sheets form
Judicial Magistrate. He stated that on
November 26, 2001 he recorded the sample audio voices of
accused Asif Reza Khan @ Rajan @ Maharaj @ Ibrahim Sah @
Samar ... Case No. 223 dated July 25, 2001. Before
recording such voice samples, PW57 observed all legal formalities
which he narrated in his deposition. PW57 proved
police
to collect voice sample of any accused, but an
order to both the parties, for the giving their
voice sample.
20. In Ritesh Sinha ... 2024
undefined
compare the voice of the parties recorded in the
CD. The prayer to send the voice samples of both
the parties
N.V. Habeebu Rahman vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2021
Author: S. Manikumar
