containing voice sample of complainant Ankush
Gupta, which were given Mark S-1 and S-2 and two audio
cassettes containing voice sample of accused ... voice sample dated 18.11.2014 of accused ASI Tooki
Singh, Ex. A1; seizure memo dated 02.12.2014 of Audio
Cassettes (S3 and S4) containing voice samples
accused on
21.04.2014 for recording of voice sample of accused. Voice of PW-29 himself
was also recorded as introductory voice. Two audio cassettes were ... Pradeep. He deposed about recording of voice
sample of accused at FSL, Rohini on 21.04.2014. Voice sample of PW-23 was
also taken
Chand went to FSL, Rohini,
where the voice sample of Surender Singh and Ashok Kumar
were recorded in cassette. The two cassettes containing the voice ... where his sample voice was taken in audio cassette by the
FSL officials or that the original recording of his voice sample
was marked
took voice sample of accused and prepared
memorandum Ex. PW2/B. He identified cassette in which voice
sample of accused was recorded ... After
recording, both the cassettes were played in order to ensure that
the recording was proper. The aforesaid proceedings of
recording voice sample and recording
Bakshi. The sample of voice
recording of the complainant was recorded in FSL in his
presence and after the recording SV-2 was marked ... obtaining his voice sample.
Accordingly, Vikas Bakshi visited FSL on 29.07.2015 and his
voice sample was recorded in audio cassette make SONY which
was provided
voice of
same person i.e. Rajbir and Harpal respectively. The voice of
speaker Marked-Q2 in the questioned recording and the sample
voice ... voice samples of aforesaid three accused persons for
office copy. PW23 further deposed that aforesaid three original
audio cassettes containing voice samples of accused persons
also consented to
give his voice sample vide Ex.PW26/E and then his voice sample
was recorded at FSL, Rohini, in two audio ... that he was
coerced to give his voice sample has to be rejected. Besides the voice
samples of the accused, two police officials who were
CFSL office for recording of voice
sample of above said accused persons. Both the accused
persons gave voice samples to the concerned authorities ... that
there was similarity of voices of accused Imran @ Shiva
and Manju @ Rani in the questioned and sample voice
recording. Thus not only the oral
from the said floppy. Voice
samples of accused persons and another cassette in which the voice of accused
persons were recorded at the time ... deposed as to at what time, the conversation
was recorded in TÂSeries cassette. Voice sample of complainant has not been obtained nor
had been
copies of the original, the video images and voice on the
questioned tapes and their samples pertaining to accused Maj. Gen. S.P.
Murgai ... dated 11.09.2007 established the voice of accused Maj.
Gen. S.P. Murgai on the said tape matching with his sample voice.
9. Investigation has disclosed
