Smitha Gireesh vs Uoi & Ors. on 2 June, 2016
Smitha Gireesh vs Uoi & Ors. on 2 June, 2016
Author: G.S.Sistani
Bench
Search Results Page
Search Results
81 - 90 of 4821 (1.56 seconds)The State Of Maharashtra vs Mohd. Ramzan Haji Abdul Wahab Haji And ... on 12 June, 2018
matter, the further evidence in respect of the voice
samples, voice analysis, voice matching, etc. becomes doubtful and
therefore, it cannot be said that ... voice samples of all the accused were recorded on cassettes. These
cassettes and the CDs of recorded conversations were sent for voice
identification
Roopesh @ Praveen vs Union Of India on 5 August, 2016
investigating agency to take the voice sample of the appellant for
the purpose of comparing his voice with the voice in a video clipping
collected ... concerned accused to lend his voice sample for the purpose of
identification of the voice in the tape recorded conversation. It
was held that
Budhha Sen Kumhar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 November, 2017
bribe was made by him. Such conversation was recorded
through voice recorder. CD of that voice record was filed along with
certificate under Section ... disputed inculpatory recorded
conversation in obtaining voice sample, so as to
better enable matching of voice sample with
recording concerned. Permissibility of difference
between reading
Pramod E.K vs Louna V.C on 14 January, 2019
appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for
recording the sample voice of the respondent in an electronic device
at the digital studio attached ... 2018 4
the plea for recording the sample voice or for comparing it with the
contents in the CD at the Forensic Laboratory. Nonetheless
Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga vs The State on 11 February, 2015
calls. As regards
voice samples, A-2 stated that he did agree on 2nd January 2009 to give
his voice sample but requested that ... collection of voice sample of A-3 and PW-28, Dr. Rajender Singh, CFSL
expert confirmed that the sample voice and the voice in interceptions
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Sanjeev Kumar & Anr. on 23 September, 2019
Corruption Act,1988.
3. The prosecution filed CDs containing voice samples and voice
recordings of the respondents in support of the case. The cognizance ... inadvertently. However, the CDs in respect of the above voice samples
and voice recordings were already filed and placed on record. Learned
Counsel
S.M. Katwal vs Virbhadra Singh And Others on 20 May, 2015
which contained voice samples of both Sh.
Virbhadra Singh and Smt. Praibha Singh, and a
Digital Video Cassette, which contained the voice
samples ... recorded speech samples
of speakers marked 'Exh-Q1 and Exh-S1' and
subsequent acoustic analysis of the recorded
speech samples of the speakers
Joginder @ Mintu vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 31 October, 2018
Rajbir Singh, the Additional
SHO of PS Ashok Vihar, to record the voice samples of A-1 and A-2. This
was done ... reflected that the sample voice of accused Vikas Siddhu and
Vikas Chaudhary is similar to the impugned voice recording of
the abductors
Sri Abdul Kareem Telgi S/O Late Ladsab ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Madiwala ... on 11 July, 2017
Senior
Scientific Officer, Central Forensic Science Laboratory, New Delhi
analysed the voice samples recorded in audio cassettes with
specimen voice samples of Accused ... gave his opinion to the effect that the voice
recorded in M.O.s 1 to 9 is that of Accused