voice samples was collected. Voice
State Vs.. Surender Singh Page No.2 of 38
3
sample of complainant was also taken. Voice samples and recorded ... recorded the
voice sample of complainant Kiran Chauhan. He sent the specimen
voice sample and the recorded CDs to CFSL, CBI for comparison. He also
voice
when he re-visited CBI Office on 24.04.2012 and further
admitted that besides Parshu Ram, sample voice of the
Panwari had also been recorded ... claimed
that voice sample of Parshu Ram was collected in his
presence in CBI Office and claimed that perhaps voice
sample of Panwari was also
Rehman (PW17) was a panch witness to
recording of voice sample of of complainant and accused persons
namely SI Vijender Pal Singh, Ct. Ravinder ... voice samples of
the accused persons and the complainant with CDs containing the sting
operation. He submitted his report opining that sample voice of
State
video CD. They were formally arrested. Their voice samples
were collected on their willingness. Voice samples and recorded CD were
sent to the FSL, Rohini ... Delhi. As per the FSL report, voice sample and
the voice recorded in the CD matched with each other. Sanction
demand of bribe with the sample voice of accused and
reported that questioned voice and sample voice of Suresh were
matching.
3.4 HC Suraj ... trap, has been denied. Registration of FIR was
denied. Recording of voice sample of accused Suresh was denied. It
was claimed that the prosecution witnesses
Vinod Kumar (PW10) was a panch witness to recording of
voice sample of accused Sudama Sharma. Deepak Kanda Nodal officer,
Bharti Airtel ... transcript of recorded conversation. His report thus matched the
specimen voice of accused with voice of complainant in recorded
conversation and vice versa. However, during
recorded speech
samples of speakers marked "Exhibit Q1" & "Exhibit
S1" and subsequent acoustic analysis of speech samples
by using ... voice of the same person (i.e.
Arun Rai).
The auditory analysis of recorded speech
samples of speakers marked "Exhibit
recorded speech
samples of speakers marked "Exhibit Q1" & "Exhibit
S1" and subsequent acoustic analysis of speech samples
by using ... voice of the same person (i.e.
Arun Rai).
The auditory analysis of recorded speech
samples of speakers marked "Exhibit
conversation between the
accused and complainant was seized by the IO and voice of the
accused was got identified on playing the said ... reply. The accused declined to give his voice
sample, citing various reasons. Statement of several witnesses were
recorded. Thereafter, sanction for prosecution against the accused
available his voice sample. Anjuman Kumar Sharma (PW16)
was a panch witness to the proceeding dated 17.06.2009 when the voice
sample of complainant ... wherein he had opined that voice of accused and complainant
in CD Ex. P1 matched with their voice samples.
3.6 Ashutosh Mathur
