Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 68 (1.43 seconds)

State vs Rahul Kumar Singh on 30 May, 2015

sample voice of the accused) and Ex. P­9 Sessions Case No. 36/14 Page No. 6 of 52 (another audio cassette, containing sample voice ... presence of witnesses Manish Sahni and Sandeep Sharma, he recorded the sample voice of accused Rahul Kumar in two audio cassettes. PW1 Sunil Kumar further
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sudhir Chaudhry vs Cbi on 11 February, 2015

giving a voice sample, the accused does not convey any information based upon his personal knowledge which can incriminate him. A voice sample by itself ... giving a voice sample an accused, merely gives an „identification data‟. When an accused is asked to furnish a voice sample he is neither asked
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V P Vaish - Full Document

State vs . on 17 July, 2015

with respect to the recordings contained in Video cassettes, which are apparently copies of the original recordings. The original recording has been withheld ... that the voice sample of accused persons were not taken and analysed at FSL to establish that the voices recorded in cassettes
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 17 July, 2015

recordings contained in Video cassettes, which are apparently copies of the original FIR No.­ 702/2007 Page 4/19 recordings. The original recording has been ... that the voice sample of accused persons were not taken and analysed at FSL to establish that the voices recorded in cassettes
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next