Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1717 (1.59 seconds)

State vs Kafait Ullah Khan Etc on 20 May, 2026

experts. Voice sample of accused Kafait Ullah was taken into two audio cassettes while voice samples of other accused persons were recorded in one cassette ... produced for recording of their voice samples. He stated that the voice sample of accused Kafait Ullah was recorded in two audio cassettes, whereas
Delhi District Court Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs . Narender Singh on 5 April, 2016

voice of accused Narender Singh was recorded in his presence. All the technical formalities before recording the sample voice of accused Narender Singh were completed ... sample voice and videography of Mr Narender Singh. Mr Narender Singh voluntarily agreed to give his sample voice and for giving videography. New audio
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Rajesh Kumar Sharma on 4 February, 2026

regarding recording of sample voice of accused at FSL Rohini, Delhi and seizure of two audio cassettes containing voice sample recordings of accused. In addition ... Article-1 and audio cassette, in which voice sample of accused was copied from the main sample voice cassette, as Ex.PW18/Article
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Shairf Ahmad on 31 January, 2024

provide his voice sample with the questioned voice to which he consented vide consent memo Ex. PW9/A. The voice sample of accused ... regarding providing his sample voice was prepared and thereafter, he was taken to FSL, Rohini where his voice sample was recorded in the presence
Delhi District Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ajay Mann on 30 January, 2020

sample voices supplied had words and sentences from the questioned voices and that he did not demand from the IO sample voices by asking ... voice sample he claimed that his consent for voice sample was obtained under pressure. He denied the transcription of the recording claiming that
Delhi District Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Abdul Latif And Ors. on 24 May, 2014

voice sample of accused Mohd. Akhtar was never taken by the investigating agency and investigating officials had on their own fabricated the voice sample ... give his voice samples does give rise to an adverse inference against him namely that he deliberately did not give his voice samples for else
Delhi District Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next