voice samples was collected. Voice
State Vs.. Surender Singh Page No.2 of 38
3
sample of complainant was also taken. Voice samples and recorded ... recorded the
voice sample of complainant Kiran Chauhan. He sent the specimen
voice sample and the recorded CDs to CFSL, CBI for comparison. He also
voice recorded to which
he offered voluntarily and accordingly his voice was recorded in the cassette
with the help of tape recorder. After recording ... accused is that instead
of his own voice sample, some other voice sample is sent to FSL by the
police for comparison in order
voice
when he re-visited CBI Office on 24.04.2012 and further
admitted that besides Parshu Ram, sample voice of the
Panwari had also been recorded ... claimed
that voice sample of Parshu Ram was collected in his
presence in CBI Office and claimed that perhaps voice
sample of Panwari was also
made the ransom
call. PW6 does not say that any recording was done in his presence.
FIR No. 1083/02; State Vs. Hemant etc. Page ... witness who
stated that they installed the cassette recorded and recorded the
conversation. Neither sample voices were taken nor asked that their
voices were recorded
Rehman (PW17) was a panch witness to
recording of voice sample of of complainant and accused persons
namely SI Vijender Pal Singh, Ct. Ravinder ... voice samples of
the accused persons and the complainant with CDs containing the sting
operation. He submitted his report opining that sample voice of
State
video CD. They were formally arrested. Their voice samples
were collected on their willingness. Voice samples and recorded CD were
sent to the FSL, Rohini ... Delhi. As per the FSL report, voice sample and
the voice recorded in the CD matched with each other. Sanction
accused denied the prosecution allegations.
4. After considering the evidence on record the trial Court convicted
and sentenced the appellants for kidnapping and murder ... Booth. The accused refused to give their
voice sample as recorded in the Order dated
1st January, 2001 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
identified by victim Mohit Ahuja as
the persons who kidnapped him. Voice samples of Ketan Kumar @
Chetan was obtained through FSL. No clue was found ... Ketan at the time of recording of his voice
sample. PW9 did not obtain the voice samples of complainant and
FIR No. 360/11; State
demand of bribe with the sample voice of accused and
reported that questioned voice and sample voice of Suresh were
matching.
3.4 HC Suraj ... trap, has been denied. Registration of FIR was
denied. Recording of voice sample of accused Suresh was denied. It
was claimed that the prosecution witnesses
Vinod Kumar (PW10) was a panch witness to recording of
voice sample of accused Sudama Sharma. Deepak Kanda Nodal officer,
Bharti Airtel ... transcript of recorded conversation. His report thus matched the
specimen voice of accused with voice of complainant in recorded
conversation and vice versa. However, during
