permitted the investigating officer to record the sample voice of the petitioner and others. Accordingly, the voice samples were also drawn pursuant to the trial ... voice by various means. However, refusal to give voice sample will not fall within the ambit of right of silence. While drawing voice sample
giving voice sample the accused does not convey information based upon his personal knowledge which can incriminate him. A voice sample by itself is fully ... conclusion but, voice sample by itself is not a testimony at all. When an accused is asked to give voice sample, he is not giving
permitted the investigating officer to record the sample voice of the petitioner and others. Accordingly, the voice samples were also drawn pursuant to the trial ... voice by various means. However, refusal to give voice sample will not fall within the ambit of right of silence. While drawing voice sample
compelling the accused persons to give their voice sample to compare with that of the questionable voice recorded in the course of intercepted telephonic conversion ... voice by various means. However, refusal to give voice sample will not fall within the ambit of right of silence. While drawing voice sample
Physics Division, Tamil Nadu Forensic Sciences Department, Mylapore,
Chennai for recording of voice sample.
!For Petitioner : Mr.K.Chellapandian
Additional Advocate General assisted ... recording the voice of the respondent/accused A1. Further, there is no
objection for the respondent to give voice sample before the Deputy Director
person to give the voice sample and therefore, a person can refuse to give
his/her voice sample by taking shelter under Article ... accused. The voice sample by itself will not incriminate
a person. The voice sample has to be sent along with the recorded
conversation
recorded the conversations. The conversation was recorded in CD and produced the same before the Special Judge, the said document was taken on record. During ... After obtaining permission from the Special Judge, the sample voice recorded in the presence of independent witness was forwarded to CFSL, New Delhi through
allowed the
voice samples to be taken holding that ordering voice samples of the accused
is not violative of Article 21 of the Constitution ... accused to be recorded and thereafter, the recorded telephonic conversation
and the voice samples to be forwarded to the Forensic Lab for study
reply issued by the
Central Information Commission, the original recordings of the alleged
conversation have been destroyed by virtue of the order passed ... proper application before the Court to establish the voices contained in the said
recordings, voice samples of the persons concerned were collected
contents in the same. He further submitted that appellant's
sample voice recorded and collected.
7.Considering the submissions made and on perusal ... substantial portion of the investigation progressed. The
appellant had already given voice sample. Therefore, further detention of the
appellant is not required.
Page
