voice of accused
Narender Singh was recorded in his presence. All the technical formalities
before recording the sample voice of accused Narender Singh were
completed ... sample voice and videography of Mr Narender Singh. Mr Narender Singh
voluntarily agreed to give his sample voice and for giving videography. New
audio
copied sample voice recordings of
accused recorded by the I.O. to the C.D. through computer and
typed voice recording mahazar ... copied sample
voice recorded in voice recorder by I.O. to C.D. and she has
typed the voice recording mahazar
trial). The
voice sample CD is proved as Ex. P2, wherein the
witness has identified his voice as well as voice of
independent witness ... identify the
voices contained therein. The witness has deposed
about taking of his voice sample during the
investigation and identified his voice
Investigation proceeded. Pre-
trap panchanama, post-trap panchanama were recorded. Voice
samples were obtained. Panchanama in that regard was also
recorded. The voice sample with ... forensic science laboratory. It appears that voice sample of
complainant was not obtained. The letter forwarding voice sample
was marked as Exhibit
also stated about voice sample
recordings mahazar drawn in the Lokayuktha Office taking
sample voice of accused. He has stated that, he has seen ... secured
accused and panch witnesses and before them sample voice
of accused was taken in voice recorder and then transmitted
to C.D, which
examined the
recorded voice in cassette marked as Mark Q1 and S1 by auditory
and voice spectrography and found that the voice sample marked ... cassette Q1 and voice sample S1(a)(b) &(c) are
similar in respect to their frequency distribution, format etc, hence
bribe was made by him. Such conversation was recorded
through voice recorder. CD of that voice record was filed along with
certificate under Section ... disputed inculpatory recorded
conversation in obtaining voice sample, so as to
better enable matching of voice sample with
recording concerned. Permissibility of difference
between reading
counsel on behalf of
respondent/Lokayukta.
Heard on admission through video conference.
Record perused.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
The appellant has been convicted ... complainant turned hostile and did not support the prosecution
story. No voice recording samples have been taken and procedure
has not been followed. Even otherwise
Sri. N. Raghumurthy vs The State By Lokayuktha Police on 9 February, 2018
Author: R
Senior
Scientific Officer, Central Forensic Science Laboratory, New Delhi
analysed the voice samples recorded in audio cassettes with
specimen voice samples of Accused ... gave his opinion to the effect that the voice
recorded in M.O.s 1 to 9 is that of Accused
