1612 of 2019
submit that the sampling procedure was not done in accordance
with the Standing Order No. 01/ 1988 dated 15.3.1988 according to
which ... dated 15.3.1988. No question has been put regarding non-
compliance of sampling procedure. Further, from evidence of this
witness, it is quite vivid that total
1612 of 2019
submit that the sampling procedure was not done in accordance
with the Standing Order No. 01/ 1988 dated 15.3.1988 according to
which ... dated 15.3.1988. No question has been put regarding non-
compliance of sampling procedure. Further, from evidence of this
witness, it is quite vivid that total
preservative, if any,
added to the sample.
Rules 26. Manner of packing, fastening and
sealing the samples,- All samples of seeds sent
for analysis shall ... into
the samples of seeds after the same have been taken. The
relevant para in both the complaints regarding the sampling
procedure carried
sample bags from where the sample is to
be drawn for preparing a composite sample.
(ii) Sampling from big godowns/high stackings: If the
procedure ... Drawal of samples from bags:
(1) Drawal of sample and preparation of composite
samples. Draw, with an appropriate sampling
instrument, (sampling probe) small portions
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
behind
using manual sampling in some cases. In essence, the petitioners
argue that the inspection process, surprise checks, and sampling
procedures were flawed, lacked transparency ... samples and conducted test as per the higher
standards titled as "Indian Standards CEREAL AND CEREAL
PRODUCTS-SAMPLING". The said samples were drawn
