about
04:30 pm, Ct. Abhishek telephonically informed Insp. Sanjay Dutt that
accused namely Bhuppi would come at Sarai Kale Khan Bus Stop at about ... raided, he would be
apprehended. He further stated that Insp. Sanjay Dutt prepared the raiding
party on the instructions of Senior officers consisting of Insp
State of Maharashtra 2001(5)
B.C.R. 577 and Sanjay Dutt v. State through C.B.I. Bombay 1994 SCC(Cri.)
1433.
In Uday ... availed of, as has been held by the Constitution Bench in
Sanjay Dutt (supra). The crucial question that arises for
consideration, therefore, is what
Satinder Kumar deposed that on 05.12.2004, SI Sanjay Dutt
got one secret information telephonically about two criminals belonging to
Sonu Gang namely Pradeep Rana ... constituted consisting of Inspector M.C. Sharma, SI Subhash Vats, SI Sanjay
Dutt, SI Rahul, SI Jai Kishan, ASI Devinder, ASI Vikram, ASI Bhoop Singh
decision of the
Constitution Bench in the case of Sanjay Dutt v. State through C.B.I.,
Bombay (II) reported
decision in Gunwantlal (supra), as also the view taken in Sanjay
Dutt vs. State through CBI, (1994) 5 SCC 410, accepting the plea
Gunwantlal vs. The State of Madhya
Pradesh , AIR 1972 SC 1756; Sanjay Dutt vs. State
through CBI, Bombay (II), (1994) 5 SCC 410)."
(emphasis
Anupam J. Kulkarni)
and (1994) 5 SCC 402 (Sanjay Dutt-Vs- State).
A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent
no. 3, contending ... detention
authorized by the Magistrate separately.
In the case of Sanjay Dutt-Vs- State, the Constitution
Bench summarized the conclusion in respect of question referred
Gunwantlal vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh , AIR
1972 SC 1756; Sanjay Dutt vs. State through CBI,
Bombay (II), (1994) 5 SCC 410)."
(emphasis
State of Madhya Pradesh (1972) 2 SCC 194 and Sanjay Dutt
vs. State through CBI Bombay (II) Crimes 1994 (3) 344 (SC), that
"conscious
learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
10. In Sanjay Dutt v. State through CBI Bombay (II), Crimes
