which he earned
will have to be taken into consideration. In Sarala Varma's case
(supra), which was also considered in Reshma Kumari ... exceptional circumstances in the present
case.
It is true that in Sarala Varma's case the age of the deceased
was taken into consideration
deceased was 43 years and the proper
multiplier as per Sarala Varma v. Delhi Transport Corporation
(2009 (6) SCC 121) which has been followed ... monthly income towards future prospects as per Sarala
Varma which has been approved by Pranay Sethi ought to have
been awarded. He also contended that
applying
the dictum laid down by the Honourable Apex Court in
Sarala Varma v. Delhi Transport Corporation
reported ... down in
M.A.C.A. No.1605 of 2011 -4-
Sarala Varma's case (supra). Evidently it is contended
that in the absence
respondent also argued by giving stress on the judgment
Sarala Varma and Ors., V/s. Delhi Transport Corporation
and another,
In the judgment reported ... between Sarala Varma and Ors., V/s. Delhi Transport
Corporation and another, the Hon'ble Apex Court held as
follows;
"30. Though
petitioners are the dependents of deceased P.Ramesh
Babu. As per Sarala Varma case 1/4 th of the income is to be
deducted towards ... Further as per Sarala Varma
case multiplier 14 is applicable. Hence loss of dependency
comes
erroneous.
6. The learned counsel has relied upon judgment in
Sarala Varma vs., Dethi Transport Corporation reported in
(2009) AIR SCW 4992 Para-lO. Another ... been
33
C
.7.
substantiated by relying upon the judgment of Sarala Varma
Vs., Dethi Transport Corporation 2009 AIR SCW 4992. By
referring
time of accident, the Tribunal following the case of Sarala Varma and
others vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr reported ... Sarala Varma’s case, the Tribunal applied multiplier ‘9’, based on the age
of the deceased was 58 years at the time of accident. Loss
time of accident, the Tribunal following the case of Sarala Varma and
others vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr reported ... Sarala Varma’s case, the Tribunal applied multiplier ‘9’, based on the age
of the deceased was 58 years at the time of accident. Loss
Income Tax Rs.8,544/-.
20. In Sarala Varma and others V. Delhi Transport
Corporation and another 3 ; National Insurance Company
Limited V. Pranay Sethi ... judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sarala Varma's case (supra),
1/3rd is to be deducted, if the number
death. In the light of the law laid down
in Sarala Varma and others v. Delhi Transport
Corporation and others ... personal living expenses of
the deceased as laid down in Sarala Varma &
Pranay Sethi (supra).
Future prospects
30. In Sarala Varma & Pranay Sethi
