Naik Seafoods P. Ltd., Mumbai vs Pr. Cit-2, Mumbai on 26 November, 2021
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT ... 2021 (A.Y: 2016-17)
M/s. Naik Seafoods Pvt. Ltd., v. Pr. CIT - 2
408, EMCA House Room No. 344
Shahid Bhagatsingh Road Aayakar
Sundarban Seafood Pvt. Ltd vs P. Radhakrishnan And Anr on 6 September, 2021
Author: Arindam Mukherjee
Bench: Arindam Mukherjee
OD 17
ORDER SHEET ... HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction (Contempt)
ORIGINAL SIDE
SUNDARBAN SEAFOOD PVT. LTD.
VERSUS
P. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM
market value of the lands, buildings, equipments sold by the
company, Roshini Seafoods Ltd., on the date of sale, and as of today ... petition are as hereunder:
"The petitioner is the Director of Roshini Seafoods Ltd., a limited
company, registered in the year 1987. The petitioner
Gujarat, 2000 Cro LJ 1988 (Guj),
the Madras High Court in Balaji Seafoods Exports v. Mac Industries, (1999) 1 CTC 6 (Mad).
13
an advance
said
cases in the judgment of this Court.
14. In Balaji Seafoods (supra), the High Court noted that the
cheque was not handed over with
Confectionary
* Dairy
* Frozen desserts
* Fruits preparations
* Fats and Oils
* Processed meats and seafood
* Soups & sauces
21. The assessee was engaged in two segments wherein
said cases in the judgment of this Court.
14. In Balaji Seafoods (supra), the High Court noted that the
cheque was not handed over with
said cases in the judgment of this Court. In Balaji
Seafood Exports (India) Ltd. Vs. Mac Industries Ltd. ,
the Madras High Court noted that
4620/2021 ORDER DATED: 17/03/2021
14. In Balaji Seafoods (supra), the High Court noted that the
cheque was not handed over with
said
cases in the judgment of this Court.
14. In Balaji Seafoods (supra), the High Court noted that the
cheque was not handed over with