morning of 25th
June 2011, the third respondent, Mamlatdar, Ankleshwar, sealed the
factory of the applicant, despite protests from the representatives
of the applicant ... amount demanded, the Factory would be sealed. The
applicant was aware of the impending sealing of the Factory even at
the time of hearing
quarries, quarry premises, factory and factory premises, vehicles and
equipments, abruptly stopped the petitioner's ongoing activities and also sealed
the factory premises ... even forced the quarry
operators and the factory operators to vacate the quarries, quarry premises,
factory and factory premises vehicles and equipments without issuing
that upon discharge of
entire liability within the timelines prescribed, the sealed
factory should be restored to the Petitioner.
20. Since the petitioner ... sought a Writ of Mandamus to direct the
respondents to de-seal the factory premises and lift the
attachment.
28. The order dated 23 February
factory Mr.Obula Reddy was taken into custody and pursuant to the confessional statement of the said Obula Reddy, the factory premises was sealed ... sealing the factory premises, perhaps after the factory Manager was released on bail.
9. It is not in dispute that the factory premises
file containing the
applications for inspection, examination reports for factory
sealed packgs/contrs, certificates by the Central Excise
office, export invoices, packing lists, Form ... file containing the
applications for inspection, examination reports for factory
sealed packgs/contrs, certificates by the Central Excise
37 C.C.No. 33942/2011
office
taking illegal
gratification from the complainant in lieu of de-sealing his
factory. The demand of bribe of Rs.2,00,000/- was confirmed ... been raised by him for
getting the factory de-sealed. Complainant (PW-3) was
taken to the room of accused Balraj
Jafrabad. SDM started to seal the factory but the owner of
the factory resisted not to seal the factory. At about 12:30 PM accused ... sealing a factory in the name of Mehroom Mechanic. The owner of the factory
was opposing the sealing. The mob of approx. 100200 persons
heed to the
representation of the petitioner and proceeded
to seal the factory premises on 09.12.2016, by
drawing up a Panchnama. Aggrieved by the action ... justification on the part of the
respondent to have sealed the factory premises
of the petitioner, for a liability that the
erstwhile owner owes
respondent No. 6 and the petitioner has got no power to seal the factory premises of respondent No. 6. The petitioner was not given ... passed an order on 8.2.2006 to the effect that the factory sealed by the petitioner may be released and the order be carried out immediately
initiate
necessary action against the 11th respondent and forthwith close and seal the
factory premise and stop all manufacturing and other operations in the
factory ... initiate action against M/s.
LA Bottlers and close and seal their factory.
4. For the sake of convenience M/s.L A Bottlers
