Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 139 (2.74 seconds)

Criminal Case/345/1999 on 2 April, 2012

353/332/511/34 IPC Plea of guilt : Pleaded not guilty Final Order : Accused Asif convicted u/s 186 / 332 / 353 / 225 IPC ... from discharging his public duties. Therefore, he is further guilty u/s 332 / 353 IPC. 12. For want of evidence, accused Shakeel Ahmed
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Ramo on 24 February, 2012

following particulars FIR No. 225/00 PS Subzi Mandi U/S 186/332/353 IPC . State V/S Ramo C. No. 4075 ... Double Storey, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi. Offence complained of U/S 186/332/353 IPC . Plea of accused Pleaded not guilty Final Order
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Amar Singh Etc. on 30 January, 2012

established all the ingredients of offence U/s 332 of Indian Penal Code . 42. Section 353 Indian Penal Code read as under : Assault or criminal ... Although the charge Under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code has been framed but Section 149 of Indian Penal Code is not a substantive offence
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Tara Chand Singhal on 13 January, 2012

hereby hold the accused guilty for the offence under Section 186 / 353 / 332 Indian Penal Code. Defence of the accused: The accused in his defence ... allegations against the accused Tara Chand Singhal under Section 186186 / 353 / 332 Indian Penal Code for which the accused is held guilty and accordingly convicted
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Rajeev Malhotra on 21 June, 2012

Name of the accused : Sh. Rajeev Malhotra Offence complained of : Section 186 / 353 / 332 IPC Plea of accused : Not guilty Case reserved ... Section 186 IPC punishes the offence of voluntarily obstructing a public servant in the discharge of his public duty. Section 332 IPC
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Rajbir Singh on 6 March, 2012

sections 186 IPC is to obstruct any public servant in discharge of his public functions. Similarly for offence U/sec. 332/353 IPC ... public duties is sin qua non for offence under section 186 / 332 / 353 IPC and same cannot be presumed, therefore in the absence
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next