dated 27.06.2019
instituted under Sections 332 , 333 , 353 , 307 / 34 Indian Penal
Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections
under Sections 341 ,
323 , 353 , 307 , 332 , 333 , 504 , 506 , 272 , 273 , 414 / 34 of the
Indian Penal Code and section
under Sections 341 , 323 ,
353 , 307 , 332 , 333 , 504 , 506 , 272 , 273 , 414 / 34 of the Indian
Penal Code and section
332 , 333 , 334 , 338 , 120(B) , 353 , 427 , 379 , 386 and 506 of the Indian
Penal Code, Sections ¾ of Damage to Public Property
353 , 332 , 333 , 307 , 153 , 504 , 379 , 511 , 186 ,
188 , 427 , 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and
Section 27 of the Arms
353 , 379 , 153 , 332 , 333 , 225 and 224 of the Indian Penal
Code and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
353 , 379 , 153 , 332 ,
333 , 225 and 224 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 45
of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
332 , 333 , 342 , 224 , 201 , 338 , 427 , 353 , 225 , 337 of the IPC
and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section
332 , 333 , 337 , 338 ,
353 , 427 , 449 , 450 , 451 , 452 , 461 , 120(B) of the Indian Penal
Code and under Sections
353 , 333 , 332 , 188 , 269 , 270 , 271 of the IPC and Section 3 of
the Epidemic Act.
The prosecution case is that during
