Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
392. Punishment for robbery.—
Whoever commits robbery shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which
Court of Appeal by Sections 386, 389, 390 and 391 or on a Court of Session by Section 307 and, when the Judges composing ... case shall be disposed of in the manner provided by Section 392. (2) No order under this section shall be made to the prejudice
relation to the company under sections 235 to 251, and the like.] [Inserted by Act 31 of 1965, Section ... Section (7) omitted by Act 11 of 2003, Section 39.] [* * *] [ Certain words omitted by Act 11 of 2003, Section 40, for Section 392
Section 392 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
392. Procedure where Judges of Court of Appeal are equally divided.
- When an appeal under this ... Bench, or, where the appeal is laid before another Judge under this section, that Judge, so requires, the appeal shall be re-heard and decided
following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely - (i) Sections 121 to 126, both inclusive, and section 130 (that ... restraint in order to the committing of the theft); (vii) Sections 392 to 399, both inclusive, and section 402 (that is to say, offences
Section 370 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
370. Procedure in case of difference of opinion.
- Where any such case is heard before ... opinion, the case shall be decided in the manner provided by Section 392
392 in The Companies Act, 1956
392. [ Power of Tribunal to enforce compromise and arrangement
(1) Where the Tribunal makes an order under section
hundred and eighty days;] (c) sub-section (2-A) thereof shall be deemed to have been omitted. (5) Section 268 of the Code shall apply ... State Government, as the case may be. (6) Sections 366 to 371 and section 392 of the Code shall apply in relation to a case
Section 394(1)(vi) ]. This power is absent in Section 391 , so
that companies falling within Section 391 , but not within
Section 394 , would ... pointed out
that Section 153-A of the 1913 Act is conspicuous by its
absence in sub-section(3) of Section 392 . According
conviction of the appellant for offences under
Section 302 as well as under Section 392 read with Section 34 IPC.
2. The genesis ... offence falling under Section 302 read with 34 IPC though
his conviction under Section 392 read with 34 IPC could be confirmed.
The Division Bench