Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7231 (2.95 seconds)

Rahul vs State on 31 October, 2014

charge-sheet was submitted under Section 393/394 read with Section 34 and under Section 398 of IPC before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate ... under Section 393 and 394 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Accused Rahul was also held guilty for offence under Section 398
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

Matin vs State on 16 February, 2016

minimum punishment has been prescribed in Sections 392 and 393 IPC. 13. Sections 397 and 398 IPC are not substantive sections ... said Sections are satisfied. Section 397 applies when offence of dacoity/ robbery has actually been committed. Section 398 IPC on the other hand
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next